Official Whitman® Coin Folder - Lincoln Cents Collection #4: Starting 2014

I specifically ordered the Whitman folder as I do like the look. There are 3 sides/pages with pre cut holes for the coins which fit perfectly. There is an information page which is attached to the third side/page on the right side, which I found quite interesting. It is worth mentioning that the spine also has the title printed on it so it is easy to find when these are stacked or on a bookcase. This is a great way to organize any coin collection and the price is quite reasonable.

Helps with my organizing effort.

Great folder. Coin slots fit snug, no loss of coins, marked well and quality material.

A product I haven't bought in a long time, quality product as I remember.

I got impatient waiting for a numbered 2024 edition so I opted for this 2014 + mostly unmarked Whitman Coin Folder. I am just a novice / casual hobby collector. As you can see there are a couple of cracks in the cardboard where it bent under the pressure of trying to fit the coins into the slots. I have found equal pressure from the top and back at the time to be the best way to get the coin in.

Good addition to my coin collection

Love it, I can now add it to my collection. Thank You, A+

Very fun collection. Coind stay in the holes.

exactly what I wanted and arrived in good condition

Normal Whitman quality item. No complaints

Holds coins as described

Nice item. Forms a set with the earlier folders.

The Lincoln Cent Folder #4: Starting 2014, by Whitman, despite being part of an established brand in coin collecting, misses the mark a bit. It covers a very recent period of coinage, which may not appeal to many collectors who appreciate older or rarer coins. Although the quality of the folder is consistent with Whitman's other products, the limited scope and lack of any standout features make it somewhat less engaging. It could be an excellent resource for a very specific subset of collectors interested in very recent Lincoln cents, but for the general hobbyist, it might fall a bit short. Therefore, I'm giving it two stars.