Cute hand drawn llama Mouse Pad mousepad - Mat - Rectangle - Llamas - coworker Present, teacher Present, desk accessories cubical decor

Did not like...quality looks different from the one in the picture. Its thin and it smells bad. Both front and back look cheap. And the seller never answered to a question I asked about the pad. I asked it was completely natural rubber because of toxins synthetics carry...and never got an answer...i know how natural rubber smells and this doesn't smell much like natural rubber. I'm returning it.

It's a beautiful mouse pad. Various shades of blue with just bit of green. In the picture it looks more aqua but it really is more shades of light and dark blues. I'm still happy with the pad and it works great at my work station.

Bought this for my collage student daughter, matches her mouse and is big enough. Bright colored, looked like a real geode. Great price!

Not turquoise. First photo it is sitting on a light turquoise pillow. Very bright blue. But nice if that's what you're looking for. About half the thickness of the one I'm replacing but not bad.

I did see some bad reviews that put my confidence down after I purchased this product. However, I can guarantee you that the overall quality and feeling of this mouse pad that I purchased is just what I expected. When placed on the table (wooden), I tried moving it by pushing it out of place. However, it remained secure on the desk. My mouse (space gray apple mouse) also moved swiftly on the mouse pad. The cat printed on it is just absolutely adoring. I would definitely recommended purchasing this product.

Love the mat it’s great quality beautiful colors it is not as thick as the mats I’ve had in the past! But when using it did not notice any difference!

It’s not the color scheme that it shows. It’s all blue and no teal green. I bought it for the colors so I’m a little disappointed.

It's an okay mouse pad. The color is mostly dark blues and not the contrasty, beautiful looking color of the photos. Wouldn't have purchased if photo had been accurate, but I'm sure that's the point :)