AKG K52 High Performance Closed-Back, Monitoring Studio Headphones, Wired, Lightweight Design, 3.5mm and 1/4" adapters, 3m Cable - Black

These are surely hard to beat for the price point. Most of the reviews point to the sound as being reasonably good and I can concur with that. They are light and comfortable and easy on the ears for long-term usage. Cable length is decent as expected and they feel reasonably well made. Material appear to be good quality. I am impressed at the lack of sound leakage which is so good when recording with particularly sensitive microphones (e.g. large diaphragm capacitors etc.). I bought these to replace an ancient pair of phones in my home studio. But they could happily grace my lounge for general music listening too as well as studio monitoring. Definitely versatile. I am delighted.

Addition, I got the AKG 92 headphones a couple of days ago Nov 2019. My K52 set were 3 years old still going wel, though the head band covering was looking a bit tatty. The dog ate the plug off of them? That wasn't covered by the guarantee strangely.. Lol They are very similar in design to the K52s and the gold colour is very snazzy and not at all garish. The frequency response is slightly deeper and slightly higher than the K52s 16 Hz to 22000 Hz. I would say the Frequency response in the mid section, is slightly flatter than that of the k52 but the sound is well balanced and they sound great, especially the sub bass on modern synth sounds. everything else is virtually identical to the A52 and the lead is slightly longer. The quarter inch jack adapter is the screw on type and is gold coloured, as opposed to the push on connector on the K52s. Got these AKG K52 headphones today.. Very good so far. Have used them for a few hours and they sound good. Don't really believe the notion about having to burn headphones in. I think it is a bit of a myth. These sound great right out of the box. Sound is well balanced and the stereo image pretty wide. I got these as a replacement for some AKG 44s because the elastic on the self adjusting band came loose but I really liked the self adjusting system on those ones and these ones have the same one. I was unfortunate with that happening on my other headphones, after about 4 months use, considered, just a bit if bad luck, hopefully these ones won't suffer from the same issue. I saw some reviews elsewhere, There are not many, at this time as these are fairly new on the market. One said they had a weak bass response or that they sounded boxy Don't know what they are talking about.. I haven't found that at all. The frequency range of these phones according to the AKG site, is 18hz - 20,000khz As the adult human ear can only hear 20 hz to around 18,000 hz which gradually reduces as you age. For reference. The bottom note on a full sized 88 note piano is 27.5 hz the top note is 4,186 Hz. These cover a perfectly adequate spectrum. I think the stereo image sounds a shade wider than the K44s did and they are even more comfortable to wear Top range is not too bright or harsh. Mid range is clearly represented. Bass is rich and detailed, without being over emphasised just like the K44s were. The top band on these K52s is made of metal instead of plastic like the K 44s and they have replaceable earpads, which the earlier model didn't have. Though no instructions come in the box to tell you how to do so but the fact that they have them, gives the impression, they expect these headphones to last a fair while. Have to look on YouTube to find for a video on how to do it, if I need to. The cable is 2.5 metres or 8ft 2 inches long and build quality, very reasonable at this price under £30. Tried various types of music through them, including some of my own and. all the detail was represented. As I played each instrument on these tracks, I would have noticed if sounds were muffled or missing. These I bought to use on my Nexus 10 tablet and they are fairly loud. I have to make sure not to have the volume up all the way. I compared these to my old Audio Technica ATH M30 headphones which I use on my computer upstairs, the AKG52s have much more bass response than those do and probably slightly less treble, that impression was born about when I checked the frequency response quoted for each of them the K52s quoting 18hz - 20,000khz and the M30s quoting 20hz - 20,000khz. The bass difference, is very noticeable between these two, the treble sounding smoother and less harsh on the K52s, though both are quoting the same figure for that top frequency range. Sound isolation very good much better than the ATH M30s, though to be fair, they are getting on a bit... All in all very pleased with them at this budget price.. Just hope the self adjusting band holds up this time. See my AKG K44 review for that story... The AKG52s have similarities to those but I actually think they sound a bit better, seem a better quality build too, let's hope time proves me correct.

I am not a great fan of headphones. Having experienced the joy of music played through the speakers of a top range audio system, they will always be a compromise unless you are willing to pay a small fortune. Then you have the persistent, subtle, intrusion induced by the headband or pressure on your ears, and always having to be conscious of the fact you are physically wired into a headphone socket. Bluetooth earphones may offer you more freedom, but at the price of sound quality. As for the in ear variety, despite different bud sizes, I cannot get many brands to comfortably stay in my ear when moving about. The best pair I have owned used an ultra-soft silicon bud, but they died a death due to hard work and are no longer made. These are now my fourth pair in my seemingly impossible quest for a comfortable, reasonably sounding, budget set of phones that I will not resent purchasing if the dog chews the lead, the cat decides to use as a surrogate mouse or the 3.5" jack fails. Sound wise, they are perfectly acceptable for the price. Reasonably well balanced, there is neither too much bass nor is the treble too harsh. The sound stage is OK, and like most headphones you are limited to a very restricted breadth with all the attention being left to right and very little front to back which is only to be expected. Overall, AKG have done a good job with the drivers at this price point, not too clinical, not too biased and overall the sound is clean but not in any way artificial or unpleasant. Comfort wise, after a few hours use my ears, as usual, started to hurt. Not as much as some in comparison to other budget phones, but enough to require a break or readjustment. The headband wasn't too physically intrusive, but my ears were definitely starting to sweat a bit. Over time, I suspect the plastic will start flaking from the headphone cups, the final death knell in the life of any headphone being the outbreak of the dreaded black dandruff. The headphone cord, being very long, is both a blessing and a curse. It would have been good if AKG had allowed this to be replaced with a shorter one, which would also solve the problem of the jack plug failing due to being plugged and unplugged so many times, another reason for many headphones bring replaced. I can see this cord getting tangled on something at some point, which may result in a premature death of this piece of kit. All in all, for the money, these aren't a bad set of cans. The inclusion of a headphone jack adapter was a nice touch, as you can use these straight out the box either with a mobile phone or a stereo amplifier. Buying headphones online without trying them out first is always a gamble, but this time around I don't think I've come out too badly.

Having just invested in a small, very simple, home studio set up - for when I don't want to go to my recording proper studio, unlock it and turn it all on - so I can do simple bits of recording; musical sketches and odds and sods, I wanted a cheap, closed-back pair of headphones, that don't leak sound. This is especially important with click tracks, which can ruin the recording of a quiet acoustic instrument, such as a guitar, with their tick-tick-tick being quite audible on the recording. I didn't want to pay a lot, and these are perfect. AKG headphones are generally superb, I have been using a high-end pair for mastering in my studio for the past 15 years or so, so bought these with confidence. Comfortable, minimal-to-no sound leaking, pretty decent sound stage and over all sound, perfectly good enough to wear when tracking a second guitar or other acoustic instrument, or when doing a vocal. Would I use them to listen to music with? Well, I will have to answer that in a few months when they have 'run in' by being used. Certainly they are not bad in all honesty; i have heard much, much worse, and at this price they are pretty damn good. I had another pair of headphones arrive today at approaching 3 times the price and they were awful, so bad in fact I have returned them.. i wont be returning these. Maybe the sound is a little muddy over all, a little lacking in sparkle, but the sound stage is pretty wide and airy, I would say the lower mid is a bit dominant, and the lower high is a bit lacking, but that's with only playing music on them for about 30 minutes; like I said, let me give it a few months for them to settle in. But so far, for the money, I'm delighted, and for the use I want to put to put them too they are idea.

Great headphones. Really comfortable and really good sound quality. I mainly use them with my guitar headphone amp. I used to use DT100’s years ago. These are just as good at fraction the cost.

*First thing to say: If you are reading the reviews, make sure they are the K52s because many are for completely different models. This dodgy practice is widespread all over Amazon and it has to stop*. I only have positive things to say about these great AKG K52 headphones. They look and feel well made and are very lightweight and comfortable to use for prolonged periods. I have used them for gaming and they sound great even just plugged into the Xbox controller. Plugged into an old NAD amplifier they truly shine. The soundstage is impressive, the music well separated and the bass not too overwhelming but perfectly balanced when equaliser is set to flat. Essentially these *K52* 'phones are made for playing and recording music to get an accurate sound but in my experience they are an excellent choice for both gaming and listening to your music through an old school amplifier. If you're only used to listening to music on a bluetooth speaker, you would be amazed by the night and day difference these make!

1. Design & Build ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🛠️ Premium Feel on a Budget: For the price, the AKG K52 looks and feels much more expensive than it is. 🎙️ Studio Ready: Lightweight with a sleek design, it includes a 3m cable and a handy adapter, perfect for studio use. 👂 Comfortable Ear Cups: The ear cups are super comfy, even during long sessions. 2. Durability ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ 💪 Sturdy & Reliable: After three months, it’s holding up really well. The long cable is durable but not the best for casual, on-the-go use. 🎛️ Perfect for Studio: In a stationary setup like a studio, the cable length is actually an advantage. 3. Ease of Use ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🔌 Plug & Play: Just plug it in, and you’re all set. It works great for both podcast recordings and listening to music without any hassle. 4. Performance ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 🎧 Clear & Crisp Sound: The sound quality is top-notch for podcasts and studio work, with great noise isolation. 🎤 Studio Star: While the long cable might be cumbersome for travel, it’s perfect for studio environments. 5. Comfort ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ 🛋️ Long-Session Comfort: Super comfortable for extended recording sessions. 🔄 Casual Use Drawback: The 3m cable can be a bit unwieldy for casual use, but it’s perfect if you’re staying in one place. 6. Value for Money ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 💸 Incredible Deal: You get fantastic sound quality, comfort, and a solid build for an affordable price—hard to beat! Final Thoughts – Overall Rating: If you're starting out in podcasting or need a budget-friendly studio headset, the AKG K52 is an excellent choice. It delivers great sound, lasting comfort, and excellent value. Just keep in mind that the long cable isn’t ideal for daily use outside the studio. 🎧 🌟 Overall Rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐☆ (4.6/5)

For the money these are pretty good. The build quality seem fine and the tone of these is fairly neutral with no obvious bias to bass or treble. Far from audiophile quality, they are lacking in high frequency detail separation and massive bass but they offer a decently cohesive sound that is easy to listen to. Being comfy to wear is also achieve with the strap and adjustability. Ideally I would give 4 1/2 stars but there is nothing to complain about for the money.

好みの音

Comfortable to wear. Great sound quality. Has shown no issues so far.

Schon seit Wochen suchte ich nach einem preiswerten Bluetooth Kopfhörer. Allerdings fallen bei diesen kabellosen Geräten ständig die kleinen Klangstöpsel aus den Ohren oder fällt einer der Kanäle aus. Es gibt Verbindungsprobleme und die großen Kopfhörer "glänzen oft mit grottenschlechter Akustik". Zu viel Tiefe (dunkles undefinierbares Tongematsche) ist für mich immer ein Zeichen, dass trendmäßiger Chinaschrott vorliegt und hat nach meiner Meinung nur wenig mit Bassläufen zu tun. So habe ich zu einem supergünstigen AKG Gerät gegriffen, der an der Schnur liegt und mich beim Fitnesstraining unterstützen soll. Von AKG habe ich bereits den 701, der ganz oben in der Liga mitspielt. Und nun komme ich auf den absurden Gedanken diese Hörer zu vergleichen. Der 701 bringt eine Bühne, die sehr transparent ist. Läufe werden freigegeben, die auf den meisten Hörern gar nicht wahrgenommen werden können. Die Bässe sind recht zurückhaltend aber sauber. Wer auf Heavy steht , ist vielleicht nicht so gut bedient. Allerdings ist der 701 auch nicht für den kleinen Geldbeutel zu haben und eher für Enthusiasten bestimmt. Der K52 ist ganz anders. Er ist nicht so transparent, aber er ist im unteren Bereich gewaltig präsent, und ideal für alles was "anturnt". Die Höhen und der Gesang sind ebenso prächtig vorhanden. Für mich steht der 52er für Ausgewogenheit. Der Körper des 28 Euro teuren Geräts ist aus Kunststoff, die Polster aus Kunstleder und alles ist nicht so gut verarbeitet wie beim 701. Die Einstellung am Kopf wurde durch Bänder gelöst, so dass der Eindruck ensteht, er würde vom Kopf rutschen. Für mein Gefühl trotzdem ok. Einrastende Kopfanpassungen wären aber weit besser. Auf jeden Fall treten bei mir weder Kopf- noch Druckschmerzen auf. Made in Wien, auch ein Qualitätsmerkmal, da von dort die Technik von AKG konzipiert wurde. Naja, zusammengebaut wird das Teil voraussichtlich woanders. Die Kabel der AKGs sind leider fest mit dem Gehäuse fest verbunden, somit anfälliger für Störungen. Kabellänge des AKG 52 beträgt 2,5 m. Fazit: Der Billigste Hörer von AKG ist für den "Rock-Liebhaber" eine wirklich gute Wahl. Kaufen, Kaufen, Kaufen - nicht nur als Zweitgerät. Preislich kaum zu unterbieten. Wie das Langzeitverhalten des 52 ist, kann ich noch nicht bewerten. Da fehlen mir noch ein paar Monate. Wäre schlecht, wenn er nach wenigen Wochen auseinanderfiele. Manchmal ist die Haltbarkeit leider auch vom "menschlichen Umgang" mit dem Gerät abhängig. Ich bin weder ein Profi noch ein großer Insider, aber durch mein fortgeschrittenes Alter glaube ich gute von schlechten Geräten unterscheiden zu können.

Top!

These are the best closed back headphones I've run across for the money with good bass, smooth sound throughout the range,and no particular coloration above the bass to the highs. The only two drawbacks would be that for closed back headphones, the isolation isn't the best, especially for smaller heads, and the overall sound character isn't as airy and open sounding with that almost laser imaging that can be achieved with the open backs, which would be at least twice the cost for those for such tonal balance as these. Sensitivity is also decent and not hard to drive with various headphone amps.