2010: Odyssey Two (Space Odyssey Series)

Though somewhat dated, the book and the series are most enjoyable. I have only read the series three times, but each reading has been enjoyable, entertaining and thought provoking. What more can one ask of any book?

"2010 - Odyssey Two" is a strong sequel to Arthur C. Clarke's renowned "2001 - A Space Odyssey". The story is well-crafted and the plot moves briskly, which makes for an enjoyable read. It's not deep on character development, and the action is infrequent, but delivered smartly and purposefully to provide the fuel for an interesting plot, expansive exposition of space, and exploration of key themes.Like the first novel, Clarke crafts his story and writing very deliberately to create a heavy and epic atmosphere. His primary theme revolves around evolution, and builds upon the mythology he created in "2001" by expanding on the role played by the unseen aliens in planting and encouraging life throughout the universe, including Earth and elsewhere within our own solar system.He spends just enough time on backstory to refresh readers on the salient points from the first book, but more importantly, provides a legend (within one of two foreword's/author's notes in this specific edition) to where the author followed storylines from his original novel, or from the famous movie which contained slight modifications.And yes, Clarke provides satisfying answers to many of the questions left without conclusion in the first book and movie.Clarke returns Dr. Heywood Floyd in this space-traveling saga, but this time in the lead role. He and two other Americans join a Russian crew aboard a starship headed to Jupiter to connect with the presumably abandoned and derelict 'Discovery', obtain information about the Monolith and find out what happened to lost crewman Dave Bowman.Dr. Floyd is a strong lead and the most three-dimensional of all characters in the story. His motivation for leaving his family on the very long journey: "Four men had died, and one had disappeared, out there among the moons of Jupiter. There was blood on his hands, and he did not know how to wash them clean."The trademark of great storytelling is the ability to convey ideas and themes through demonstration rather than outright telling. As a reader, I'd rather come to understand a characters' nature and motivations through the demonstration of certain behaviors and backstory, rather than be spoon-fed and literally told of one's characteristics. Clarke does a nice job of layering on the flesh of Dr. Floyd early in the story, and continuing to build as the plot progresses. None of the other characters on board the Russian craft are more than two dimensional, which increases the focus of the novel on Floyd, Star-Child/Post-Human Dave Bowman, and perhaps the story's central character: Jupiter and its moons.Among the Americans is Dr. Chandra, the parent/inventor of HAL9000, the 'Discovery's' near-sentient ship-computer that killed its original crew, which led Bowman to decommission its' cognizance. Chandra plays a key role as he works to restart HAL with the hope that he can help guide the ship back to earth, but also to shed light on why it developed the compu-psychoses that led to its' violent behavior. Chandra is drawn as the lovingly patient and near-obsessed parent focused on nurturing his lost child. The relationship between Chandra and HAL generate some terrific scenes throughout the book as HALs personality reemerges, including the first time it awakens from it's 9-year-long sleep: "Good morning, Dr. Chandra. This is Hal. I am ready for my first lesson."Dr. Floyd notices and comments on Dr. Chandra's work: "...to watch the steady regrowth of Hal's personality, from brain-damaged child to puzzled adolescent and at length to slightly condescending adult." "(It's like) disturbed youngsters were straightened out by all-wise descendants of the legendary Sigmund Freud! Essentially the same story was being played out in the shadow of Jupiter." The Chandra-HAL relationship creates tension within the plot as the crew can never fully trust HAL following his behavior in "2001"."2001" concluded with the Monolith's aliens shedding Bowman of his human form and 'raising' him up to a being that needs no real form, but exists as pure energy. This evolved Bowman returns in "2010" and acts as Clarke's guide to Jupiter and it's moons. He uses Bowman's exploration as a means to delve into the physical nature of those celestial bodies and postulation on what life could exist in those extreme environments. The exposition is detailed and written with a poetic flourish.Bowman is the evolutionary result of the experiments performed on the pre human man-apes by the Monolith millions of years ago, and famously portrayed in the original movie. In "2010", he becomes aware of how the alien beings introduced life and evolution throughout the universe, and monitor their progression over millions of years. These aliens are, for all intents and purposes, God.Clarke writes that the aliens, "...in all the galaxy, they had found nothing more precious than Mind, they encouraged its dawning everywhere. They became farmers in the fields of stars; they sowed, and sometimes they reaped."More ominously, he continues, "And sometimes, dispassionately, they had to weed."

The continuation of the story that started in 2001: Space Odyssey. Heywood Floyd is a hero who shows vulnerability along with creative genius.

The author picks up after the first story with a small gap in time. We see a joint team reaching the ship: Discovery One. That story is believable and it's better than the movie. The story sets the stage for the reset of the series as the characters will surface again.

Arthur C. Clarke’s 2010: Odyssey Two is odd in that it is a closer sequel for the film 2001: A Space Odyssey rather than the original book.One thing 2010 does is give us quite a bit of back story as to what happened in the previous book, so it is possible to follow this book without having read 2001: A Space Odyssey (you may miss out on a great book, though).Set nine years after Discovery One’s ill-fated mission, 2010 involves Dr. Heywood Floyd joining a group of Russians on board the Soviet craft Leonov. Their objectives are to discover what happened to Discovery One pilot Dave Bowman, investigate the mysterious monolith from the previous book, and identify what went wrong on the first mission.It was going to be difficult for Clarke to replicate 2001, which, in my humble opinion, is a classic and superb sci-fi novel. It leaves you wondering and thinking about the vastness of the unknown. How often do sequels crush the memory of a great first book or film? Too often. That being said, 2010 was a decent successor to the first book despite its flaws. 2010 fails to capture and match up with the wonder, awe and mystery that was 2001. Where 2001 leaves some ambiguity to one’s imagination, 2010 often readily answers and reveals too much, which lessens the experience a tad. Also, I thought the politics thrown into the mix was a bit unnecessary, and maybe a little forced.Despite this, Clarke is highly imaginative and shows the depths of space exploration, and he manages to aptly continue this story. The book does get a little technical at points, yes, but then there are some moments of intrigue as Floyd discovers answers to those mysteries of Jupiter, the monolith and Dave Bowman’s mysterious message: “It’s full of stars!”2010 could have been a finishing touch to this series, but obviously there are two more books that continue this plot going. I’m sort of interested in reading the next book, although it has been given quite a few negative marks. Not sure if I should leave well enough alone.

This is the second book of the series. It picks up nine years after the first book. It has all of the surviving characters from the first book and adds several new characters. It brings a satisfying conclusion to the story arc. There are two chapters in the book that repeat the text verbatim. I am not sure why the author decided to do that, but it is there. They are spaced apart by several chapters, I just didn't see the point. I highly recommend this book. I am looking forward to reading the next book in the series.

Better than the first. Pure Clarke, no Kubrick. His collaboration with Kubrick, both in book and film, is great. But this is different. This is the Clarke of Childhood's End. This is the Clarke that readers deserve. This book does not try to be the '...proverbial good science fiction...' book; this book tries to be good in its plotting, imagery, scientific accuracy, and highly edible language. Not for all, but for science fiction lovers, and futurists. Pure fun and very quick, spend a weekend on it, maybe less. Best book in the series. Enjoy it!

Estado do livro está muito bom para um produto usado

Compliments 2001 and the movie.

In continuation to the 2001: A space Odyssey. The science fiction level in this book is almost at the scientific level and it is a must read for everyone.

Top ! je ne savais qu'il y avait une suite au livre qui a donné naissance au film de Kubrick. J'ai adorée me replonger dans cet univers et je vais entamer le N°3Très facile à lire en VO quand on a l'habitude et surtout on veut connaitre la suite donc on y va !

Brilliant book and makes the film even better