Wolverine Titan 8-in-1 High Resolution 35mm, 127, 126, 110 and APS Film to Digital Converter with 4.3" Screen and HDMI Output

Very Good Product. Does what is says it will do. Love it. Very easy to actually use. So far I have had no issues. BUT the only thing I didn't understand is that for any 8mm FILM....you can ONLY TAKE SNAP SHOTS of the Film and are NOT able to copy it from the film directly onto your PC or the card that this unit can use. So I will need another machine (they make one) for the film copying I want to do. But for the slides and negatives and for shots of a film this is THE Product! I would highly recommend this product and this Seller.

It is quite easy to operate and scanning is fast. The final quality of the image is not the best but in most cases, good enough. Noise appears in very dark areas. It scans in high resolution which, in my case anyway, was an aggravation as I had to reduce size to 12 inch (72DPI) width down from about 70 for each scan . I scanned over 800 images from APS film which is not the best in the first place but each and everyone had to be post processed in a photo editor to reduce size and remove noise. But for the money, I would buy it again as it did, quite easily, get the job done.

I read reviews on just about every slide and film scanner available before landing on this one. I have to admit that even though I've been shooting slide film since the late sixties and I also needed to scan my fathers slides, I really only had about 450-500 slides to scan. So while I usually do buy quite expensive photo gear, I decided to try an economy unit, after all if you don't spend a lot on one and the results aren't great, well then what have you to complain about? However this little Wolverine scanner works great! And the complaints about slow scanning are false. I got a routine down right away and for all the slides I had to scan I spent only a couple of hours one afternoon. In other words I was done in no time. The picture quality is fantastic! This little scanner corrected for incorrect white balance without me making any adjustments at all. When I was 15 years old I was developing Kodak Ektachrome film using the Kodak E4 processing kit. One day while bringing one of the developers to temp. I broke the bottle of developer in the pot of water on a hot plate as was my method. In a crazy quick decision I reached for a bottle of Kodak D-76 B&W developer. The result was all the shots on that roll of film were very blue. When I scanned these slides with the Wolverine scanner they all came out color corrected! I just couldn't be happier with this little unit and recommend it to anyone looking for one to purchase. The sample photo was taken in 1956.

Does indeed scan easily and quickly to SD card, listing image number on screen to later catalogue your images

Slides (Color, 35mm) :1. Quality of the scan is OK, as in "Mediocre". if the slide is well-lit, daylight scene, it is scanned wellenough to print a 3x5", maybe 4x6". Don't expect much, and you will not be disappointed. both coloraccuracy and details will be "meh"2. The 35mm slide-holder only fits 1 slide at a time, and is designed for Cardboard mounts.Plastic-mounted slides are slightly too thick. You can force it (I did) but each time you are riskingbreaking the slide-carrier.(note - you can buy on amazon slide-carriers for this scanner that will hold 4 slides at a time. Thesemake things faster, but they are also designed for cardboard-mounted slides)Negatives:Wolverine Titan is a good negative VIEWER. It is a mediocre-at-best negative SCANNERWhen you look at a negative on the unit's Screen, in many cases it looks good (up to the resolution ofthe screen), but with good coloring. But when you look at the saved pictures, the colors are skewedbadly, with a greenish/bluish tint. IF you know how to do some Post-processing, and you are willingto fix up each frame separately - you can get it in most cases to look decent for display on a computerscreen, maybe good enough for a 3x5" print (for well lit frames).If you really need higher-quality slide scanning, and can't afford a service(typically 0.50-$2.00/slide), and do not want to use a scanner either due to cost or its1 slide/Minute typical speed, your best option is to buy a slide-photographing adapter for yourdigital SLR (or build one - The web has many DIY designs.) I have aNikon D3200 DSLR (a pretty basic "beginner's" model) and I bought the 40mm MACRO lens +"ES-2" Slide adapter and a Strong LED-Lamp panel. It worksThe Nikon ES-2 adapter will allow me to photograph Negatives, not just slides, but since I don't have the really expensive D850 camera that knows how to reverse the colors correctly, I have to then take the results and edit them in some Photo-shop like program, with results being Mediocre and each frame requiring too much work. (if you just photograph a color negative and ask the program to just reverse the colors, the result will usually have a strong color-cast, with everything tinted towards orange. Removing this is a bitch.

I had high hopes for this scanner but alas it was not to be. I have about 4,000 color slides from the 60s and 70s that I wanted to convert to digital media. The scanner is easy to use and you can scan a large number of slides in a short time. The problem is that I didn't realize the viewer screen is WYSIWYG. It wasn't until after when I was looking at some scanned slides that I discovered the tops were chopped off. While this isn't a big deal in certain shots, it ruins any shots with people in them. They look like an amateur photographer cut off their heads.The second problem is with the color and it's described at length in other posts. Anyone that has worked with color slides knows the color is very rich, which is why so many folks took slides back in the day. Most of the slides I was converting were taken by my father in the 1960s. I hadn't seen them in over 50-years and I was amazed at the color and clarity of the photos that was still retained after all these years. Unfortunately, the conversion is poor and the color is usually too dark. Too bad! I guess I'll have to hang onto my slides a little bit longer until someone comes up with a better quality scanner.

I like this a lot. Ir's a GREAT product for the price.But understand - the job of this device is to accurately and at high resolution convert your film to a jpg. That's it.Then you have to do some work in a photo editor to get the digital image you want.Any film these days is decades old! Spoiler alert - you will have to do some work. I'll bet the original film image is not that great.This device will not make bad pictures look good; it will not convert your old Polaroid snapshots into brilliant VHS tape. It will not bake you a cake.I really feel sorry for the company that has to field insanely stupid questions. Oh, well. That's the norm for the internet.

Update;I have now scanned over 4000 35mm slides, and for my purposes this has worked great. Perfect no, but I think it will be what most people could use.Easy setup, easy to use.My slides date from 50 years ago to 20 years ago. While the white balance can be of on some with high contrast in like clouds and such, it is usually and easy fix on a Macs preview page.Make sure you dust your slides well.I have included another photo I scanned with no clean up done.It will be the one of logs on a stone foundation.thanks for reading.I have only had this scanner now for about two hours and have scanned over 330 slides. Scanning slides was the only reason I was looking for film to digital scanner. All my slides date from the mid 70's to late 80's. Most are outdoor scenes or family photos. Lots of barns, cabins, dogs and such.I would highly recommend this scanner if you are looking of something to save family memories from your parents or grand-parents slides. I read many reviews before buying this scanner, and even purchased a higher end one, which I returned because it was overly complicated for what I needed it for and the software kept crashing.The Wolverine took about 2 mins. to set up and within another min. I was scanning slides.I first scanned just a couple then moved the card to my computer to see how they turned out. I was very happy with the results so continued to scan the 300 plus I did tonight.I does on occasion not get the color correct, and correcting the color on the scanner is not productive. Save that for your computer. For me I would say I will not touch up scans on over 90% of what I scanned.If you are needing the scans for publication or very large prints you my need something better.However, if you keep your slides organized after scanning, if you ever want to have one blown up you can then send it out.Like I said if you are looking for an easy, quick and I think good way to save family memories, this is a great slide scanner.I will include a couple photos so you can judge for your self. These are from the late 70's - early 80's.

The product was delivered on time and as promised.It took some time to understand how to scan, but once you get the hang of it,its a breeze. The resolution of the images is not very high quality, but being a Fine Art Printmaker,I could make a high quality print of upto A4.Very handy and definitely a must-have for those who work with film cameras.

Works exactly as described and is very easy to use. I bought it because I have alot of family slides from my late father and wanted to convert them so I could put some photos on a digital frame for Mum. The photo shown that has been converted by the Wolverine converter was taken in February 1962. This is a brilliant unit for this purpose. Quick, Quiet, and Easy to do. Only thing I would say to improve would be to include larger trays to do more slides at a time rather than one reload one reload and so on. But mall price to pay for many happy life memories being able to be shown in a modern way.

Erfült sein zweck

probleemloze levering en de resultaten van de digitalisering zijn bevredigend, maar corrigeren van de ingescande foto's blijft nodig. Toch tevreden !

Arrived as scheduled. Quick to scan out of the box. A bit of searching to figure out how to download but then was able to scan 500+ images in one night. Very useful as some of my negatives from 35 years ago are starting to degrade and so much cheaper than paying a company to convert. These are more for preserving the memories and to store so huge super high resolution files would not be an advantage. The automatic conversion of colour negatives to a colour photo file is great - consistent with the original prints. Seen some of the criticisms on colour and resolution. Would say the colour is faithful to the negative inserted in the whole. If you want super high resolution scanning then the $2K plus machine is probably what you want, but isn’t necessary for those of us scanning personal photos for archiving.