Osprey Kestrel 48 Backpack (Prior Season)

I seriously considered buying a very cheap backpack for an overnight backpacking trip. Eventually I came to the decision that a cheap pack was going to cause me serious discomfort hiking all day. It seemed like any investment of money into a "cheap" pack, would end up costing me more because eventually I would want a better pack anyway. It seems the cost of the premium backpacks has to do with the internal frame, the adjustability of the frame and straps, and the overall quality of materials. I am happy with my decision to invest more dollars up front for a pack that will last me many years to come. My daughter has a Deuter pack, which was the main competition in my mind for me. Research on the packs led me to feel a certain love for the Osprey brand. I didn't want teal or purple, either; which contributed towards my decision to buy this black pack. I am a 5'10" tall woman. I looked at the female version of several packs. I decided to go with the man variety because I am tall. This pack has a lightweight internal frame that seems awesome in my opinion. The frame is very well shaped within the bag. The frame "poles" or base structure does not poke out at the fabric in any place. The frame and the fabric seem to work together into a perfect shape. There is a huge velcro panel within the back, where you can adjust the main, cushioned shoulder straps to the ideal height. I had to reset this a couple times to guess the correct fit for myself. There is probably a way to measure but I didn't think to do that before hiking. On the hike, I was able to make many adjustments to get the weight of the pack to rest mostly on my hips, pulling away less at my shoulders. This is super important to me because I once had a muscle tear in my oblique muscle, which has left me forever hating backpacks. I am happy to report no muscle twinges due to this pack. I carried about 14 pounds on my trip, including the stuff and the weight of the pack. I liked that my sleeping bag fit perfectly into the sleeping bag compartment at the bottom front of the bag (with room to spare). I liked the various side pockets. I loved the top section of the bag, which is poofy and roomy, with two different pockets. The only think I do not love about this amazing bag is that the small hip pockets are not big enough to hold my iPhone 6. I was able to stuff it in there but it was so tight that I couldn't use it as a quick grab pocket for the phone. The two hip pockets are more suited towards small snacks, keys, or other very small items. It is not easy to get at those pockets while hiking. They are a good use of space but not helpful as quick access. I noticed other hikers had pockets on their front, perhaps on the front straps that go over your chest, or on separate fanny pack type bags. In the future, I will use this backpack without expectation of getting anything in and out while walking (like my camera/phone). Also I would add that although my main priority in purchasing this pack was adjustable weight management, the style factor is a nice bonus. I like the look and color and brand.

Great pack. Light and big enough for 3-5 days on the AT. Full featured, well thought-out, and comfortable once adjustments are dialed in. I like that the waist/hip belt fits "bigger" folks, and that it was generally comfortable with a full load (approx. 35lbs). On my 3 day trip through southern PA and MD, the most helpful features were the bag compartment, which stowed my EE 30degree down Convert and down puffer jacket. Also, being caught in the rain, I appreciated the included pack cover. Note to hikers--keep rain gear easily accessible; digging around and unpacking dry gear leads to more wetness. The only improvement would be longer sleeping pad straps. The ones included were too short for my Themarest Ridgecrest Classic. I carried an Alps Lynx 1 tent, clothes, food, stove and fuel, and all the essentials. Headlamp, bug spray fit, hand sanitizer fit in one side hip-belt pocket, while the other was reserved for snacks only. The ample-sized pockets on top and below the lid held maps, wallet, etc. One more note; when bear-bagging, don't forget to check your side pockets for food and/or smell-ables, incl. hand sanitizer, sunscreen, snacks, and snack wrappers. No sense in attracting unwanted camp visitors over a forgotten piece of trash stashed in one the many pockets this great organizer bag has to offer.

I'm a woman 5' 3" 140 w/ 15.5" spine and the S/M fits well. I considered a different Osprey pack sized XS and it was WAY too small in the hips. I used an older version of this Kestrel 48L bag and only "upgraded" because the original bag was a M/L and sized for someone w/ a longer spine. My favorite feature on the older model were the twin exterior side zip pockets that run from top to bottom on both sides. really nice storage for rain gear/ food/ extra layers. The newer version only has one of these- the other zipper opens the bag's main compartment for access to gear without unclipping the brain and unpacking the top... For such a small bag- I think this feature is a little silly. The bag already has a zipper on the bottom for access to the main compartment as well as the obvious top entry. Maybe a 65L+ bag needs this extra access point- but not this 48L. That being said, it's still a fantastic bag. Really deep water bottle pockets on the side that can accommodate tripods, roll-up camp chair, etc. (They aren't cut conveniently for accessing while hiking like other models) Brain has mesh pocket on underside which is handy for essentials and key clip. This newer version only has one pocket in brain instead of two- a good update that keeps you from forgetting which pocket you put something in. Also, the newer version includes an optional "shelf" in between the sleeping bag compartment and main compartment. I haven't decided if this is useful for a pack under 60L. Overall, great for an intermediate outdoor enthusiast such as myself!

I LOVE this new pack. I've been using the same Kelty 96L pack for the last 10 years. Even though that pack is still going strong, I rarely go on trips long enough to necessitate that much carrying room anymore, so I looked into something more appropriate for weekend trips. I wanted another pack that would last me a decade or more, and all the reviews pointed to Osprey being the brand for that. The Kestrel has all of the accessories I was looking for: -The hip pockets are just the right size and placement for lip balm, snacks, and a camera. My past few trips have had many more pictures taken on the trail because of how easily it is to get my camera out. -I like to hang my pack on a tree about head height, so the front pocket that allows access to the main compartment is perfect. -It has enough small pockets here and there to make organization easy. -The hiking poll straps are easy to use, even while hiking. -The external hydration bladder spot is FANTASTIC! I used to have to dig out almost my entire pack to refill it, and it was nearly impossible to put the full bladder back in an already packed pack. Now, I can remove and replace it with relative ease. -The back adjustment is very easy to manipulate -I haven't had an opportunity to make use of the attached pack cover, but it seems convenient. I'm sure some of my great experience with the Kestrel can be attributed to how outdated my old pack is, but I've loved this new pack. I've used it on three trips and it still looks brand new.

great pack, loaded with features! This is plenty of pack for a weekend hike. very well laid out and comfortable.

I picked up the Osprey Kestrel 48 after doing a lot of research on lightweight and durable packs for long distance hikes and camping. I've used this pack to hike sections of the Appalachian Trail for multiple days at a time. It has plenty of space for your camping needs, food, and water. There are ample pockets on the sides for maps and things you want to access quickly. It comes with a built in raincover so you don't have to buy a separate one. The pack fits well and is adjustable to your body type and hiking style. I highly recommend Osprey packs because of their durability and their lifetime warranty.

I like opspry packs and this one does not disappoint, I was looking for a pack to day hick in cold to extreamly cold weather. My hiking partner does not like to carry a pack if not absolutely necessary so I get to carry everything x 2. My current day pack was way too small to allow me to pack " just in case " winter gear like goose down parkas and extra gloves. Keep in mind I also carry a gas Optimus Polaris with extra fuel for winter trips and a larger cook kit for melting snow. The other pack I was looking at was the stratos line mostly due to the side loading features. I didn't want to dig into the pack to pull out items. While this pack is a top loader the addition of the side zip to gain access to the entire pack contents is perfect for my use. The additional long zippered side pocket is a plus and the stretch front pocket sealed the deal. There are plenty of packs that have this feature set on the market but they cost twice as much as the Ospreys Kestrel. Based on my use the Opspery packs that I own match and in some cases exceed any of the more expensive pack brands that I own. I know my torso lengths and know how to set up a pack and this one was go to go within a couple of minutes, the simple yoke adjustment works perfectly. The straps have plenty of adjustment length without being too long and the hip belt adjustment is nice and secure. One additional feature that I like and is missing on my more expensive top loaders is the strap on the top of the draw string closure, if the pack is not full to capacity the top of the pack can sag and not be fully captured by the lid allowing rain or snow to enter. By securing the red strap the front of the pack is pulled up and towards the back of the pack, ensuring a nice tight fit on the lid. The bungee corded sides of the lid also help to effectively seal the top opening. This is a full featured pack with attention to small details that make the use of the pack a pleasure.

This pack is an absolute workhorse. It's not the biggest, nor is it the lightest, but it's the perfect middle ground for backpackers like myself: those looking for dependable gear that has useful features without any frills. I take this thing with me pretty much everywhere I go, and although it's a little expensive you're getting more than your money's worth. Obviously, if your trips consist of only superlight backpacking or multi-week expeditions, this probably isn't the pack for you– in that case, get a more trip-specific pack (smaller or larger in liters); but if you're just looking for a durable jack-of-all-trades piece of gear, this is the pack for you.

Ich möchte mit diesem Rucksack eine Pilgertour von Portugal nach Spanien unternehmen. Wir haben einige Probewanderungen durchstanden und ich habe mich für ihn entschieden, weil er grundsätzlich alles kann was ich brauche. Wenn ich etwas verbessern könnte, wären es nur 2 Dinge: er könnte noch 1 kleine Tasche im Inneren haben und die Polsterung am Hüftgurt könnte etwas dicker und/oder etwas länger sein. Dabei muss ich sagen, ich hatte nie Schmerzen oder Beschwerden. Es wäre mehr für die Bequemlichkeit und den Sitz. Eine Tasche im Inneren wäre etwas übersichtlicher und man könnte sich noch besser im Rucksack organisieren und kleine Sachen schneller finden. Aber wie gesagt, da immer irgendwas nicht perfekt ist, behalte ich ihn, denn er hat auch viele gute Seiten. Ich mag die vielen Gurte und Halterungen am Rucksack. Er hat mehrere Kompressionsgurte an den besten Stellen. Sie engen nicht die Mesh-Taschen ein was ich persönlich gut finde. Mein 2 liter Trinkbeutel passt locker in das Fach am Rückenteil. Er hat 3 Möglichkeiten um an sein großes Staufach zu kommen. Natürlich von oben, über einen seitlichen Reißverschluss und von unten über ein abteilbares Fach. An beiden Hüftgurten ist ein kleines Reißverschlussfach. Deren Bedienung ist etwas hakelig aber ok. In seine Seitentasche passen die Gehstöcke perfekt. Wie dafür gemacht. Seine gesamte Kapazität habe ich trotz einiger Versuche noch nicht ausgelastet. Gefühlt passt mein Kleiderschrank hinein. Fazit insgesamt: Ich hab ihn liebgewonnen. Sollte es wichtige Veränderungen während unserer Pilgertour geben, werde ich berichten. Rückblickend auf unsere wunderbare Wanderung kann ich den Rucksack weiterhin nur empfehlen. Er hält immernoch super durch, es passte alles rein, er ist gut zu tragen und ich würde ihn sofort wieder kaufen.

夏場のテント泊用に購入しました。 必要な機能がそろっていて、形もシンプルで美しい。 Ospreyのロゴが写真のものとは違いモノトーンのシックなタイプになっており 予想外でしたが期待以上に良い感じです。 たっぷり入るというものではありませんが入る分だけ持っていくようにすれば 良いと思います。

Ich hatte die Wahl zwischen 5 Rucksäcken: den Fjällräven Abisko Friluft 45, Bergans Rondane 46L, Lowe Alpin Eclipse 44/55, LA AirZone Trek+ 45/55 und dem Osprey Kestrel. Am Ende wurde es der Abisko Friluft. Ich habe alle 5 mit ca 13kg beladung ca 15 Minuten getragen und auf Bequemheit getestet. Beide Lowe's fielen für mich raus, da die Hüftgurte zu schwach und auch unbequem waren. Trotzdem ist gerade der Eclipse durch sein relativ niedriges Gewicht eine interessante Wahl, falls man keinen großen Wert auf den Hüftgurt legt und weniger Gewicht dabei hat. Da ich jedoch auch Mehrtagestouren unternehmen will und da ggf auch mal viel Wasser/Gewicht mitnehme ist der Hüftgurt das A und O. Beide LA's sind hervorragend verarbeitet und durrchdacht. Beide haben auch ein Raincover. Als nächstes konnte ich den Rondane ausschließen, Hauptgrund war das Verstellsystem der Schultergurte welche mich am Rücken drückten. Der Rondane ist mit dem Eclipse der leichteste der 5 mit ca 1100 g. Der Rondane trägt sich sonst sehr angenehm und auch die Hüftgurte tragen das Gewicht gut. Er wirkt aber auch etwas labil aufgrund der großen Meshtaschen. Nun stand ich vor der Wahl zwischen Osprey und dem Fjällräven. Beide haben übrigens ein Raincover, jedoch hat nur der Osprey ein Extrafach dafür Der Kestrel 48 gefiel mir eigentich sehr gut. Er trägt sich eigentlich hervorragend, wirkt stabil und hat interessante Taschen und Zugangsmöglichkeiten. Was gegen den Osrprey sprach war das nicht abnehmbare Deckelfach. Das ist meisten nicht so wichtig jedoch wenn man Seil/Isomatte etc darunter verstauen will geht das mit dem Friluft viel besser und man hat auch dadurch mehr Platz. Der Osprey hat eine Außenmesh was der Abisko leider nicht hat, dieser hat dafür an gleicher Stelle ein großes Zusatzfach. Bei beiden gibt es Riemen um Sachen unter den Rucksack zu spannen, jedoch gefielen mir die des Fjällrävens besser, da man das Gewicht mehr darunter bekommt. Der Fjällräven hat jedoch kein Schlafsackfach was schade ist, aber nicht wirklich benötigt.Dafür kommt man durch den riesen Fronteingang super an alle Sachen, dies ist beim Osprey iO jedoch nicht so gut. Die Kompressionsriemen machen an beiden Rucksäcken was sie sollen. Im Allgemeinen ist der Abisko Friluft wesentlich simpler. Jedoch nun zum Tragesystem. Trotz dem abstehenden Rucksack wegen dem Netztragesystem, merkt man das Gewicht nicht mehr als beim Osprey. Und auch ist die Belüftung super, was ich so nicht gedacht hatte. Klar schwitzt man bei Bergtouren trotzdem, aber der Rücken bleibt wesentlich kühler was sehr angenehm ist. Mit ein paar Einstellungen tragen sich beide Rucksäcke hervorragend. Jedoch nach ca 10 Minuten merkte ich wie der Osprey leicht auf das Hinterteil von oben drückte. Dies hatte zur Folge, dass sich die Beine schwer anfühlten. Dies war ausschlaggebend für den (natürlich auch wesentlich teureren)Fjällräven. Beides sind super Rucksäcke und wäre das Trageproblem mit dem Osprey nicht gewesen, wäre er wohl meine erste Wahl gewesen.

Product exactly as expected

旧タイプから更新、使い勝手がさらに良くなりブラックカラーは本当にカッコいいです。 間違いのない一品です。