Sapiens A Brief History Of Humankind By Yuval Noah Harari - Paperback

Sapiens explores the history of humankind, from early hunter-gatherers to modern societies. It explains how stories, beliefs, and systems shape civilizations more than biology alone. The book forces you to question what we consider “progress.”Who Should Read It- Curious thinkers who enjoy big-picture ideas- Readers interested in history, psychology, and society- Anyone who wants to understand why humans behave the way they do

This book gives us a basic understanding of how we got here. The tone of the book is slightly pessimistic but the vastness of information makes the book a worthwhile read.Condition: Good quality cover and pages. Product was as described.Delivery: Estimated delivery was 2 days however, the book was delivered within 24 hours.

Excellent - i highly recommend it. Very well written. Exceptions on some of the author comments when it comes to religious comments shows some biased opinion - otherwise this is a book to must read

I read one third of this book yet but I must say discovering about our history the best thing we can read in this busy world

For the curious amongst us, this book delivers incredible outside-in perspective connecting the dots on who we are as human beings, where we come from, why we behave the way we do, and the motivations, fears and precedents that underlie so much of how and why we behave as societies and sometimes defy societal norms to behave as individuals out for our own personal gains.

Great storytelling, very enriching

Exactly as expected

First time to order books online and i am not disappointed. Love it!

To me the strength of any book is that it makes you THINK. And boy does this make you THINK. Sometimes you need to hear different sides of a argument to reinforce or dismiss your "beliefs" In both areas I was either happy to let go some "beliefs" and happy to hold onto other "beliefs" Prof Harari's style of writing is interesting. Throughout each book ( Sapiens and Deus) he will pick a subject eg Agricultural Revolution and give all of the pros of his argument, no cons. Each of his arguments sounding very convincing and very logical. As I was reading through it, I found myself disagreeing with some of his points. As you read on, he shapes his arguments / logic / power of persuasion onto the negative / other side of the argument or the side where I initially disagreed with him. Its as if he was listening to my objections and then he answered them. Initially I found his approach a bit frustrating but this probably turned out to be the books main strength. It gave very strong / powerful arguments (where needed) for both sides of the topic under discussion. He covers every angle, some at great length and just touches on others. The Agricultural Revolution was where it "began to go wrong" , not a statement I agreed with but it is very hard to disagree with his powerful arguments but I am sticking to my guns. I have rarely read a book that was so well researched. If I had my way I would make this book compulsory reading in every school in the World. It is an absolute joy to read. From a social point of view it will give you more than enough info to make intelligent contributions to discussions and not sound geekish. Go buy it! I hope this helps youP.S. I had a humourous thought when reading the first chapters of the book as to how a white supremacist KKK member would react when he found out that Sapiens originated in Africa and Dinosaurs did not play football with us.

Informative, interesting and simply written for those curious about evolution. To be read and reread

Brilliant!

I love this book as it has a lot of insight on many things that we may normally miss. It describes and breaks down human behavior and how it may have been developed and it sure DOES start RIGHT at the bottom. Very informative and I recommend this book!!The only thing that sometimes really throws me off is that (he may be right, but I doubt it) this man thinks he knows exactly how 'sapiens', or rather, those early stages of them, like neanderthals, used to act and behave all of those millions of years ago. That is, let's face it, completely impossible to EXACTLY know and/or interpret ... even for him. Anything could have happened back then. It can be compared to how people thought certain things about animals that in the end were completely different to what they actually did in the wild.I still recommend this book.

Sapiens is a brief overview to the major stages of human history. It is definitely a unique account in that it focuses on a few major events in human history that catalyzed changes to how people organized. The writing style is engaging and the author always tries to focus on issues from all perspectives and as a consequence many people reading might feel shaken at times or perhaps even insulted. The result is a success though and the author forces the reader to rethink the way they look at human culture and ideological preferences. The author also forces the reader to think about in what light should we be thinking about human progress and the course of history as it is a deep issue that is often glazed over with a final focus on what our conception of progress is for the future given we have put ourselves on the borders of being able to engage in intelligent design of ourselves.Sapiens is split into 4 parts. The first starts with the species which includes those now extinct within the homo genus. The reader learns about the spread of various branches of the family tree and the timing of their diffusion. It gives a sense of the initial diversity proto humans had several hundred thousand ago. We learn that there was nothing inevitable about the human form and how in certain environments larger species evolved and in others dwarfs had a competitive advantage. The author from the beginning convincingly describes how our history is very hard to see as destiny when looking back at the initial conditions we faced. The author describes how around 70k years ago there seemed to be a change in our mental structure that led to an advantage over other proto-human species and we soon eradicated other homo genus competitors. The actual events that catalyzed this is impossible to know and the author describes to the reader the impossibility of looking into the past as the data is non-existent and the best we can do is imagine and such an exercise is largely fruitless. The author also details how the spread of humans led to the death of local ecosystems and notes how humans in Australia and elsewhere led to the extinction of a great number indigenous species.The author then focuses on how hunter gatherers migrated to farming with the Agricultural Revolution which began around 10,000 years ago. The author discusses how individuals had a more difficult lifestyle in agriculture but human density increased. The agricultural revolution can be seen as an oddity through this lens as the happiness of people was diminished though the ability to procreate was amplified. The lifestyle of hunter gatherers was less cyclical than farming as one could move with the seasons and change diet accordingly. Farming forced people in closer proximity with animals which led to higher disease and in addition cyclical crop yields. The author also discussed how farming led to larger communities and as the bonds of association weakened the growth of the state began. The author notes that people can live in communities of 100-150 people before intimate trust breaks down. Early rulers of civilizations all exploited the fact that people were tied to the land in farming communities and things like the pyramids were built due to the ability to organize large labor pools which was only possible when farming could be depended upon. The author discusses how different Hammurabi's code with the declaration of independence. The system of law of the agricultural revolution is profoundly different than today and the author forces the reader to think about whether there is such a thing as right and wrong or is there just context and human construct.The author then starts to focus on perhaps one of the most important human constructs in history - money and religion. The author describes how money allowed people to coordinate to a degree that was impossible in its absence. Barter economies are impractical at very low levels of trade but money solves these problems amazingly well. The author gives some basic economics lessons and describes how money solves issues of trade and created a medium for people to trust one another. The author also discusses religion and how that also allowed people to have something in common with one another on a grand scale. The author discusses how religion shouldn't be viewed through the lens of God alone as religions like Buddhism are not centered on God. The author focuses on what religion does for people and how it creates social relations. The author also discusses the evolution of polytheism to monotheism and dispels with why polytheism seems silly in todays world by describing the conditions in which it arose and was applied.The author then moves into the modern era and discusses the scientific revolution and the growth of capitalism. The author discusses our discovery of our place in the solar system and the transition to the scientific method. The author then re-focuses on money and the transition from money as a medium of exchange to money as a store of wealth and the growth of the banking system as a means of allocating savings to investment. The author very intuitively introduces the concept of the money multiplier and how belief in growth in the future greased the wheels for investment today. The author over simplifies a little and infers that lending in the past was not due to the fact that people were unaware of lending but rather there was no economic growth so loans were seen as much riskier as the world was zero sum. Nonetheless as the merchant class grew and embraced the framework of double entry bookkeeping the power of capitalism to fuel growth emerged with force and propelled smaller merchant nations to take on global roles. These included the likes of Holland and England at the expense of countries like Spain. The author gives good examples of how enforcement of contract and rule of law led commerce driven growth. Interwoven throughout the history are questions of whether growth in and of itself should be a goal and discusses the philosophy of capitalism and libertarian ideology but contrasts it with other conceptions of fairness as well as how markets can fail. The author then moves on to the impossibly deep subject of happiness and asks what it is intrinsically. He goes through monotheist religious conceptions, Buddhist conceptions and biological conceptions and discusses the limitations of each and every view, especially as they are not mutually consistent. He highlights how framing of expectations defines happiness and how things like money are helpful to a point then are of no consequence to happiness. The author then discusses the technological frontier and what current science is doing in the area of biotechnology. This is a motivated overview which then brings up the question of what is the point of those focusing on ethics or the science etc. In particular the author asks whether when we take actions that enhance our "progress" they are driven by deep reflected beliefs about the long term effects. The author frames his question so that answers like extension of human life can no longer seem like undoubtedly beneficial as they have spillover effects on distribution of inequality, livelihood of animals and ecological deterioration.Sapiens gives a history of humankind through a very different lens to other books that I have read. It focuses not on the history of events but on certain social constructs that changed our fundamental means of association. There are of course not discrete events but a continuum that leads to our human history but the author frames things in such a way that his ordering is very intuitive. The author reminds the reader throughout the book that concepts of right and wrong are situational at best and will always be subjective. He continually highlights that our lives are sustained by our beliefs in self sustaining myths. It is a scary thing to realize at times but the lessons being taught are true as there were times where we did not have the same myths and our social construct was entirely different. The author ends with important questions about how to think about the future. It is not a guide to give one a sense of what to do but rather it is a guide against being complacent in the importance of where we stand in history. This is an entertaining and thoughtful book.