Condensed Chaos: An Introduction to Chaos Magic

Now let me preface this by suggesting that you also read books by Robert Anton Wilson, he introduces concepts of 'reality tunnels' that make the concept of a 'meta paradigm' more accessible. Not everyone will need Robert Anton Wilson's writing to 'get' chaos magic, but his books are quite valuable anyway - and if you do have a problem, his writing should clear it up. And after you read Condensed Chaos, I'd suggest Pete Carrol's Liber Null and Psychonaught. Liber Null and Psychonaught is meant to be the introduction to Chaos magic, but 'Pope Pete' (he did 'invent' chaos magic, cribbing from Austin Spare to do it) tends to be pretty BAD about creating very specific paradigm concepts that can fool a person into thinking it's a 'one right way', and also he is very intelligent and a science buff and his metaphors and use of language can be intimidating to many. So read this AFTER Condensed Chaos, please! Chaos magic is a 'meta paradigm', it suggests that every 'magical act' from prayer to Voudon works the same way : Belief + Gnosis + desire = result! Gnosis in this sense means a state of 'not thinking', such as when you are absent minded, experiencing sexual orgasm. And the 'Belief' is unrelated to truth and indeed can be temporary, as in suspending your disbelief as you might to enjoy a not entirely realistic action movie! So when any author writes about chaos magic and suggests specific ideas, they are shared because they work for the author, not because it is an ONLY way to work. What works best for any chaos magician may be unique to that chaos magician, it takes some practice and focus on the results you get to find what works. That said, this Condensed Chaos is EXCELLENT! And much of what Phil Hine shares will work for YOU and anyone else! I also appreciate that Phil Hine presents a coherent and practical approach to magic that will definitely help you realize positive results sooner rather than later! This is the chaos magic introduction that will excite you and get you using the unfair advantage of magic in your life!

It’s the most readable book on magic I’ve seen.

Making much needed self-reflection and self-administered psychotherapy fun and magical AF. 👏 👏 👏 Phil Hine helps you grapple with those impossibly large, nebulously abstract and complex thoughts, feelings and ideas. He shows you how to turn them into tangible symbols with a personality, little anthropmorphized friends you could work with more easily- and joyfully!

Everyone interested in magick will get something out of this book, but I think it will appeal to some more than others. My one major caveat is that the typesetting, proofreading (or lack thereof) and editing in this book could be better. There are spelling and grammar errors, not tons, but enough to be noticeable and make me wonder "Where was the editor/proofreader for this?!" But if you can ignore that, this is a really useful book. Some of us agnostics left organized religion not because we had a great, huge falling out or personal schism with it, but only because it became less meaningful over time or did not provide much spiritual support or just didn't jive with our personalities or intellect. This was true of me. I turned towards paganism/wicca in my 20s not out of rebellion or in search of a "new religion," but more because "religion" had never much worked for me spiritually. I thought a spiritual tradition based in nature and the rhythms of the seasons would suit a nature lover like me. So I bought a lot of books on the general subject of magick/Wicca, as well as grimoires/books of shadows. But much of the rules, rituals, ingredients, equipment, and timings (sabbats, solstices, equinoxes, full/new/dark moons) which are at the very least expected (and often strictly required) were daunting, difficult, impractical, expensive or unavailable, or required waiting and precise timing. It seemed like every book I bought pushed beginners to spend as much time as possible practicing magick, and to preferably find and join a coven--as if every reader's ultimate goal was to become a high priest(ess). The implication was that you had to be 'serious enough' about magick (because it's "dangerous") to devote lots of time to studying it -- and if you didn't, then not only is magick not for you, you're also kind of irresponsible. But that's not how I've ever been about any religion or spiritual tradition. Why should magick be any different? Yes, there are naturally adept spiritual leaders for whom it is a calling. Their long training and great devotion helps laypeople in need and distress. But you don't need one of them just to pray for yourself or someone you care about. So why do I need to train seriously for years and join a coven just to occasionally do a spell or two which may or may not work, but will make me feel better for having done it? I couldn't seem to find books aimed at curious newcomers where casual/occasional, solitary practice wasn't looked down upon. It was all surprisingly (and disappointingly) dogmatic (and kind of elitist). wtf? That a spiritual tradition which arose from nature turned out to be nearly as ritualistic and inflexible as the organized religions that tried to stamp it out, was more than disappointing, it was disheartening. Then I found this book (and a couple of others). This is not a book of shadows/grimoire. It is not a "how to" book. It is a book to change how you *think* about magick. It's about the philosophy behind chaos magick. It is basically a general intro, but it's also anecdotal. So while some spells are mentioned in passing as examples, you should not expect this to be a reference for spells. Some topics are advanced. The reviewer who mentions the inconsistencies in this book is correct: there is some inconsistency ("there are no rules" vs. "you must do it this way"). For the most part, it seems that when speaking about magick in general the author believes there are (or there should be) no rules. But for certain specific actions (like servitors), the author strongly believes certain rules should be observed and such magicks should be worked carefully. This seemed cautionary rather than patronizing. The author's point seemed to be that tapping into some of the stronger powers has consequences because the flow of energy is not merely one way, it's two way -- for what you receive, you may also have to give something. Plus there is always a chance something you *didn't* ask for may tag along with what you *did* ask for. No, The Wiccan rede ("an' it harm none, do what ye will") and the three-fold law are not espoused in this book. The author seems less concerned with rules than with laws -- like, laws of physics. Framed more or less in those terms (which pleases the scientific side of me), the gist is that for every magickal action, there is an equal and opposite reaction... so you need to be prepared for that. Another aspect of this book that is a little inconsistent is: some of it (the more general discussion) seems aimed at the very novice practitioner, but other parts of it (more specific topics) discuss quite advanced magick. Some of the advanced stuff was over my head. It's there if I ever need it, but I don't see myself going that far. What I liked about this book was the DIY, non-elitist, and therefore empowering approach -- especially for the solitary or casual practitioner. The general message is, if you want to do magick, do it: use whatever you like and say whatever you like. Just make sure what you say and use are meaningful to *you*, and do it with clear/specific *intention*. Don't worry about getting it 100% right, 100% of the time, with 100% correct ingredients, recitations, rituals, timings, etc. Experiment with it. Above all, know (and focus on) what you specifically intend to bring about. The author is not advocating a cavalier attitude towards magick, here. He is saying that the formal requirements outlined by established practitioners erect unnecessary practical and spiritual barriers (the latter, in the form of doubt) in would-be beginners. More importantly, if objects, items or rituals are used merely to adhere to magickal formalities (traditions) but do not hold personal relevance for the practitioner or the target of the magickal act, they may have no effect -- or may even have an unintended effect. Those who dislike deviation from tradition may perceive this to be relativism, and I suppose it is. But to me it makes perfect sense. It stands to reason that certain items, objects, herbs, etc. would have completely different meanings to completely different people on different continents (or even the same continent) from different ethnicities or cultures. Not to mention that there are plenty of modern objects and items which lack age-old symbolic meaning, yet may have very specific meaning for practitioners and are appropriate for use in a spell (emoticons, for example). Finally, some objects that have fallen out of use now lack meaning and relevance they would have had for most of the general population maybe fifty, sixty years ago (e.g., who uses clothes-pins now? besides me). The non-elitist, DIY aspects of this book, more than any others, spoke to me where all the other books on magick/wicca, spellcraft, and grimoires had not. For the first time reading a book on magic, I thought, Hey, I can really do this -- anyone can! Emboldened by the ideas in this book, re-thinking magick and how to practice it along the book's lines, I modified a few spells and ideas from a couple other books (Supermarket Sorceress by Lexa Rosean and The Magick of Folk Wisdom by Patricia Telesco). And they worked. Quite well, actually. Obviously, the more one does something, the better one gets at it. But that doesn't mean your first few attempts will automatically fail, either. You're not a preschooler with an undeveloped mind and rudimentary hand-eye coordination learning to ride a bike, and you don't need training wheels. You're an adult with a fully developed mind, body and spirit learning to enact your will on multiple levels including the metaphysical. Another review of this book says if you crossed out the word "magick" everywhere it exists in this book, what would be left is a book about asserting yourself in the world. This is true. Magick is just the 'edge' you're giving yourself to do that. If you have felt intimidated, daunted or disheartened by the dogma, rules, requirements, rituals, ingredients, and sometimes subtle (sometimes not) elitism of other books on wicca/grimoires... If you can't or don't want to devote all your extra time to learning and practicing magick (any more than, in the past, you devoted all your extra time to going to mass or church in your previous religion or the one you were brought up in)... If you want to just go ahead and do it (magick) yourself, but you're worried about the warnings you've read in other books about practicing magick... Then read this book and consider chaos magick. You will probably like both.

Loving the content of this book. …. but this edition has many typos. Hey Falocon Press, do you need to hire a new proofreader? I got you

A truly amazing reprinting for a collectible hardback edition of a classic book that should be required reading for any seeker out there. Interested in metaphysics, magick, Energy Working, Witchcraft or other Occult systems for taking control of your life, taking responsibility for yourself and reigniting the sacred fires fueling your natural passion for knowledge, ritual and reclaiming your power to directly produce, shape and form the path ahead to reflect the life your will has cast. Highly recommend!

This is the first book I've read on magik and I'd say it is a good beginner book. I'm happy I bought a physical copy because it's good to go back to read even parts of it.

One of the greatest books on Chaos Magic