

Desertcart purchases this item on your behalf and handles shipping, customs, and support to South Africa.
๐ฏ Stay sharp, stay connected โ the ultimate hands-free comms for pros on the move!
The WALKER'S Razor Walkie Talkie Attachment is a water-resistant, voice-activated communication device designed exclusively for Walker's Razor RSEM Series shooting muffs. Featuring 22 channels with 99 sub-channels, a 3-mile range, and up to 12 hours of battery life powered by included AAA batteries, it offers hands-free, crystal-clear communication ideal for shooting ranges and outdoor adventures.









| ASIN | B07QFCP93T |
| Additional Features | Water resistant |
| Battery Average Life | 12 hours |
| Best Sellers Rank | #6,597 in Sports & Outdoors ( See Top 100 in Sports & Outdoors ) #15 in Hunting & Shooting Eyewear & Hearing Protection |
| Brand | Walker's |
| Built-In Media | 3 AAA Batteries |
| Color | Black |
| Compatible Devices | Walker's Razor shooting muffs |
| Connectivity Protocol | Ultra High Frequency (UHF) |
| Customer Reviews | 4.6 out of 5 stars 5,768 Reviews |
| Frequency Range | 400-470 MHz or 450-520 MHz |
| Global Trade Identification Number | 00888151021507 |
| Item Dimensions D x W x H | 5"D x 10"W x 10"H |
| Item Type Name | Walker's Razor Walkie Talkie Handsfree Communication up to 3 Miles |
| Manufacturer | GSM LLC |
| Mfr Part Number | GWP-RZRWT |
| Model Number | GWP-RZRWT |
| Number of Batteries | 3 AAA batteries required. (included) |
| Number of Channels | 22 |
| Special Feature | Water resistant |
| Talking Range Maximum | 3 miles |
| Tuner Type | Digital |
| UPC | 888151021507 |
| Unit Count | 1 Count |
| Voltage | 3 volts_of_direct_current |
| Warranty Description | 1 Year Limited |
| Water Resistance Level | Water Resistant |
| Waterproof Rating | IP65 |
A**N
Great for the range. Uses FRS no crypto.
These were quick and easy to set up and install! I have only used the push to talk function and it's easy to find with gloves on. These are by no means "secure" and cannot be encrypted. They use FRS which has the sub-channels which anyone can tune to and hear your comms. These are cool for ranges and talking to friends who also have some kind of comms that use the same frequency. The battery life is pretty standard for walkies as long as you aren't transmitting frequently. The quality is pretty good and worth the cost. I didn't test the range but I'm sure considering the antenna size and power limitations, you could get a few hundred yards LOS and maybe a few hundred feet in a forest. Sound quality is standard to FRS.
D**D
Great addition to Walker Razor Slim ear muffs.
These work great with my Walker Razor Slim muffs. Much better communication while on the range and I also think they may be useful while hunting. I havenโt had the opportunity to check out their range.
M**H
Nice
I like them just wish they were rechargeable only 12 hr battery life could get expensive, on the good side, the headset doesn't have to be on for these to work. Update: Battery last a good bit more than 12 hr and they work great in high noise like a lawnmower.
T**D
Great solution.
This is a review of two related items: ~ Walker's Razor Slim Electronic Muff (RSEM) light teal color (ASIN: B076HG138S; item model number: GWP-RSEM-LTL; price on 2025/05/23: $32.79; price 2025/05/30: $46.46) ~ Walker's Walkie Talkie (WT) attachment (ASIN: B07QFCP93T; item model number: GWP-RZRWT; price on 2015/05/23: $26.20; price today: $28.99 down from $49.99) I've used the Howard Leight Impact Sport (HLIS) electronic earmuffs for years, so some portion of this review will be in comparison to the HL. The Walker's RSEM is very similar to HLIS in design and in function. The headband, the muffs, and the general construction is very similar as if they copied each other's design. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) has a Noise Reduction Rating (NRR) of low to mid 20s. For hearing protection while shooting, I don't consider 20 dB of reduction to be adequate, and I usually wear NRR 30 disposable foam earplugs under the muffs. Because the amplified electronic earmuff volume can be turned up, NRR 30 earplugs would be fine to wear underneath. In a traditional non-electronic earmuff, wearing foam ear plugs underneath maybe too much attenuation if you want to have a conversation with someone. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) has a slim design. Collapsed, they are moderately compact, and do not take up a lot of space in the shooting bag. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) has an auxiliary headphone jack, so you can plug in an audio plug to listen to music, or use this jack to plug in a two way radio attachment. Walker's makes the WT attachment which is affordable and easy to use. Meanwhile, I'm not able to easily find a simple solution for the lay shooter using the HLIS. There is no active noise cancellation, however, I could say this offers active noise reduction with passive noise isolation; noise isolation from the ear muffs, and noise reduction from the microcircuit that selectively amplifies ambient noise except for loud noises. The RSEM comes in many colors and designs, and while they retail for $79.99 on Amazon, some can be found on sale for around $32. It's hard to find them all and compare prices on Amazon because they're not all on the same Amazon page. Currently, it looks like the Razor Tacti-Grip Slim Electronic muff (ASIN: B08LXS9B9M; item model number: GWP-RSEMRH) is the least expensive at $34.45. The Howard Leight does offer some color and design options, but far fewer than Walker's does. These retail for $90 to $110 on Amazon, and some can be found as low as $60. The RSEM (just like the HLIS) is not that comfortable to wear, but it's tolerable for a few hours. They can be worn over a baseball cap. They won't fit very well over a normal thickness beanie. Now, onto the Walker's WT attachment. This is thing that sets the RSEM apart from the HLIS. This attachment is affordable, easy to install, easy to use, and requires no other equipment. (In contrast, I did come across two way radio adapters that turn a handheld radio and the HLIS into a communication device, but that's not quite affordable or easy to use.) After I installed three AAA batteries into the WT attachment, I attached it to the RSEM. The instructions didn't mention removing the rubber cap to the headphone jack, but I felt this was necessary for a good fit. I was initially unable to hear any received transmission. After a few moments, I found that this was because the WT attachment didn't fit onto the muff very well, and the plug wasn't fully seated into the jack. With some force, I was able to mate the WT attachment to the RSEM, and was able to hear received transmission. The mic seems a little short, but it picks up well even with VOX. There is a bit of delay from the time I start speaking until VOX activates. If you're familiar with two-way radio operation especially on a related frequency, you would know that you have to give it about a second after you key the mic to start taking, else you cut yourself off: it's almost like that. On the WT attachment, I don't think it's that it won't start transmitting, but I think the issue is the VOX activation is not fast enough. The solution is to talk like an airline pilot. "Uhhhhhhhh, this is your captain speaking...." The only adjustments to the VOX sensitivity is "HI" or "LO," so fine tuning may be necessary to talk louder or softer, or adjust the microphone placement away or closer to the mouth. I wish it had infinite sensitivity adjustment using a dial, and I wish it worked better. Being able to use the full list of 22 FRS frequencies is nice, unlike cheap walkie talkies that only offer 10 or so. The priority channel feature is nice and could come in handy at a large event when users are on different frequencies: this is basically a scan feature. The audio quality is OK, but this is a $50 toy radio, I guess. The 99 sub channels are not really sub channels, but by using CTCSS, transmission from radios not using the same CTCSS is not heard on the handset. Wikipedia has a good explanation: "CTCSS tone codes are sometimes referred to as sub-channels, but this is a misnomer because no additional radio channels are created. All users with different CTCSS tones on the same channel are still transmitting on the identical radio frequency, and their transmissions interfere with each other; however; the interference is masked under most conditions. Although it provides some protection against interference, CTCSS does not offer any security against interception or jamming, and receivers without CTCSS enabled will still hear all traffic." Being an FRS radio, if you use this in a busy area, you may unfortunately have to hunt for an open frequency. My only concern with the WT attachment is wether the WT attachment would stay properly mated to the RSEM during movements. I can pull on the bottom of the WT attachment and partially unplug it moderately easily even with the top clamp on. It may be that the plastic moulding of the RSEM or WT attachment is inconsistent, and some reshaping or modification is needed. I'll continue to monitor, and see if I can identify an easy solution. Overall, this is a great solution for on the shooting range.
C**E
Great accessory
Takes some practice to nail down using them. Not impossible but not the most practical system. Still I like them because of the price and versatility of being able to use them with my walkers is great. They barely add any bulk to my walkers. I have not gotten a chance to test the range or battery life but product seems durable and robust.
J**G
Great quality and functional
All the Walker products have been great. I was skeptical about quality, but Walker definitely delivered. Itโs useful for taking my kid to the range and boating/UTV rides. Allows us to communicate clearly.
A**N
Love it
Have purchased 6 so far and all work great
D**S
terrific value and functional gear
super simple system to mount and use. I love how functional and simple the design is, and the fact that you can do PTT or Voice activated. They are a bit expensive, but the convenience and the light weight of it makes it an easy choice over traditional comms, especially on a range where you need an alternative to yelling and hand signals.
J**A
Muy pesado
Funciona muy bien, solo que es muy pesado con el aditamento
Trustpilot
1 month ago
2 weeks ago