WD_BLACK Western Digital 1TB WD Black Performance Internal Hard Drive HDD - 7200 RPM, SATA 6 Gb/s, 64 MB Cache, 3.5" - WD1003FZEX

I recently lost a PC, and am going through a technology upgrade cycle, and wanting to have data redundancy and convenient clones of hard drives to test under various scenarios (different PC's, docks, cloning hardware and software, OS's, etc.) So, I recently bought four of these (One from Amazon, and three from another PC vendor). All four worked as expected right out of the box, taking nearly a 1 TB of Windows 7 OS and user data from other PC's via various drive cloning processes, and then showing up as expected and letting me acess and update the data just fine. The drives seem to run reasonably cool, and are fairly quiet (considering I'm running them in external open SATA docks for now), and the speed is fine. Just what I'd expect from a modern WD drive. I don't take chances with my data, so am happy to pay the premium for the WD black technology and reputation vs., say the WD blue. I can't report on reliability/durability yet, since I've had these drives less than a week. If I have problems worth noting, I'll plan to post updates. In my experience (from memory), over the past 20+ years, I've had a LOT of experience with roughly 30 WD drives. All consumer drives, size ranging from about a GB to 4 TB. I've had only two problems. One was completely my fault. Back in the day when they sealed the drives with some kind of rubber gasket, I tore a small section of that removing a drive from a desktop case the first time. (Not a HW guy -- didn't know what I was doing). That drive crashed in a few days -- which again was COMPLETELY my fault as air (with hair, dust, etc) got in there for awhile. I had another drive start making noises and refusing to accept a full hard drive clone via Partition Magic version 8.X -- probably in the early 2000's. Again, not wanting to fool around with my data, I quit using that drive. The main reason I've stuck with WD is the drives seem to be very solid and perform consistently. I've use lots of both bare OEM and full retail kit WD drives, depending on prices/convenience.

I purchased this drive to replace a failing one on a relative's Windows-based system. I also used the Acronis True Image WD Edition Software, downloaded from the manufacturer's site to clone the old drive. I was half-way through the installation when I thought, "What if I were just a general consumer and not a computer geek?" In other words, what if my relative had ordered this drive and tried to replace the old one without calling me? It probably would not have gone well, as it arrives as just a drive in a box, with no documentation or hints of what to do. The documentation on the manufacturer's Web site is fair, but maybe not enough for an average person off the street. With that in mind ... The installation went very cleanly. I had a spare SATA cable handy, which I needed during the replacement, and a SATA power Y splitter, which I did not need in this case. Those items do not come with the drive: You will have to purchase those separately if you need them. You may also need to buy 4 drive screws, but I personally did not need them for this installation either. I was going to use different software to clone the failing drive, but decided to use the utility provided by the manufacturer on their Web site. I Read The Friendly Manual and it worked very efficiently. After cloning, I removed the old drive and rebooted with only the new one. Everything was fine. I did not run any extensive diagnostics, but this new drive is relatively fast and quiet with no obvious defects so far. That was just a day ago, so I will leave my rating at 5 stars for now. Other reviewers have had quality and return problems after a few months and have submitted lower ratings. Hopefully, years will go by and I won't hear about any problems. The manufacturer makes kits providing additional documentation, cables and such if you need them -- but for me this purchase was a good option.

Well, my last WD Black drive only lasted 2 years, but that's the nice thing about the 5-year warranty. I got this one as a mirror. The old drive started chattering loudly at 100% utilization during virus scans and backups about halfway through its short 2-year lifespan. One day it finally failed - first disconnected itself, and then when I reconnected, it appeared as "EMPTY." I first tried scandisk, and it fixed errors, but the disk now showed as full. I ran the free WD Diagnostics and it failed the short test, then on the long test, confirmed it had "too many bad sectors to recover." I read online to run chkdsk and do the full surface scan. It took 2 days to chug through the drive, but I got almost everything back. I had a backup drive copy, too, but I had a couple of things from that day that weren't backed-up...like my TurboTax file, which was almost complete (Murphy's law). I got back the most important files, bought this newer version of the same drive (the free replacement is now its mirror), and restored everything else from backup. This drive (and the replacement for my F1002 model) are running perfectly well, and I can't hear them over the fans, which is a nice change. I have one piece of advice when buying drives: get the highest rated drive with the longest warranty possible that you can afford. I got this one on sale. I thought about the 2TB or even 3TB versions, but I already have a 240GB SSD boot drive, and another 1GB drive (a Seagate that was a replacement for one that lasted 2 weeks - this one is a lucky one...I can tell :). Not to mention, 5TB of external drives, and a 3TB NAS, so why risk a bigger drive? Bottom line: good drive - fast, and quiet, and I sleep better with a 5yr warranty and a good backup!

Theses hard drives have always been good. My only complaint is the packaging. Two came in the box - bare drives in nothing more than the anti-static bags and some strips of 'air pillows' with only two that were still inflated. the drives were basically loose and free to bang around in the box. Not a good idea anytime, but probably an even worse idea with the volume of packages that USPS was dealing with right after Thanksgiving. No way to really tell if there was any damage to the hard drives until they are actually put in use, and even then, it might not show up immedaitely.

Working good after 1500 hours so far: smartctrl -a /dev/sdd: ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x002f 200 200 051 Pre-fail Always - 0 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0027 175 174 021 Pre-fail Always - 2250 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 246 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 200 200 140 Pre-fail Always - 0 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x002e 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 099 099 000 Old_age Always - 1446 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 11 Calibration_Retry_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 0 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age Always - 106 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 247 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 111 103 000 Old_age Always - 32 196 Reallocated_Event_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0030 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x0032 200 200 000 Old_age Always - 0 200 Multi_Zone_Error_Rate 0x0008 200 200 000 Old_age Offline - 0 user:~# sudo hdparm -Tt /dev/sdd /dev/sdd: Timing cached reads: 7414 MB in 2.00 seconds = 3708.38 MB/sec Timing buffered disk reads: 514 MB in 3.01 seconds = 171.04 MB/sec user:~#

I have for my own uses pretty much come down to this: NO other drive, or other new drive, unless it is a WD drive. Yes, they are that reliable and that good... plus, the price is right.... as long as you buy them using a degree of wisdom. Buy the right type of drive(life & use), the right physical size of drive(fit), the right characteristic of the drive for the use intended(speed), and from the right store (price). This is one of the best internal drives that WD makes right now (IMHO). It is fast, not THE fastest, but fast; it has a good sized cash memory built into it (64 MB) to help with speed and processing, and does not cost too much either! Possibly, from what I have seen, right now.... this specific drive just may be the best bang for the buck that is out there! Some are faster, but require 3 or 4 times the money too! Some are larger too, and the same applies to cost. No one out there has a better or longer warrantee than WD drives do. WD does not "lavish" customer service on us, but they ARE there if you need them!! You just need to apply a bit of effort now and then to get it. Good people! How can you go wrong? Buy with confidence. Enjoy!

I have had 5 Black Series drives over the years and haven't had any problems and two are 5 years old. This drive appears to maintain the Black standard and though it is only a bit more than a month old it is working fine, is quiet, and is also cool running for a hard drive. Performance is as expected for a HDD, and at less than $70 it was a good buy. Expecting a good long trouble free life from this just as my other Black drives have been. Never have had to reformat a Black drive due to problems, wish I could say that for a sorry Seagate that I bought and had problems almost from the start. One thing I'd like to see all manufacturers do with their warranties is if you have problems with a drive within the first year then they should step up and give you a brand new drive rather than a used one that has been "recertified". It would go a long way to restore confidence in a industry that has cut so many corners that they have reversed the normal trend for a mature product to become trouble free, and have created a market full of new drives that are either initial failures or short lived. The "modern" hard drive is essentially an updated version of technology first introduced in the old Winchester drives that have been around since the 80's. MTBF numbers are straight from Fantasyland and used for marketing rather than actually depicting how long the drives should last.

I've had two WD Blue drives fail on me, one laptop HD within 11 months ciritically and losing everything. I really hate losing data and admittingly don't backup anymore, per se. I used to run DLT4 backups daily on all my systems, but now I just clone drives when a drive sounds like failure is setting in. I also use gSMARTcontrol to monitor my drives. Yup, I could also drop files to thumb drives to backup as well and do that with truly important files. Anyway, the whole point is, I have a somewhat blind trust in these WD Black drives. They have a 5-year warranty, so I know they are expected to live longer than Blue, so why not pay the few extra dollars to possibly get a far better drive which probably has a far lower failure rate? I currently have two WD Black 1TB drives, and the older one seems to run hotter. Mind you the system these are in is an antiquated and not well set up box. Also, my office is ridiculously hot in the Winter, currently 85 degrees, and stays that way for about 2 months out of the year, since here in the South, Winter is really short and freezing cold days are sandwiched between Summer like days. Here are the SMART figures on my old and new WD Black drives: Item: Old and New Raw Read Error Rate: 0 and 0 Spin-Up Time: 1291 and 1875 Start / Stop Count: 349 and 97 Reallocated Sectors: 0 and 0 Seek Error Rate: 0 and 0 Power-On Time: 45140 and 7466 (5 years, 54 days, 20 hours) and (311 days) Spin-Up Retry: 0 and 0 Calibration Retry: 0 and 0 Power Cycles: 347 and 97 Head Retract Cycles: 170 and 46 Load / Unload Cycle: 349 and 55 Temperature: 49C/120.2F and 37C/98.6F Reallocation Events: 0 and 0 Everything else: 0 and 0 So, basically, the old WD Black drive have been going for over 5 years and has never had a bad sector or read error, even though it has been on the edge of boiling up. It, for some reason, is always running hotter. I've swapped where these drives are installed and the results were the same. The old drive runs hot, but it still is going. I have been noticing a bit of a whine from the drive occasionally, but currently it is sounding normal. The newer drive which is about a year old has consistently been running about 10 degrees cooler. I'd suspect it is time to replace the old drive, so I might just order another one of these today. If not a WD Black, I'll probably go for an HGST (a WD company) which according to some public information from cloud service providers has some of the lowest failure rates. I'm also cautious about getting larger size drives, worried about failure rates spiking due to pushing limits. But that doesn't seem to hold water, I've seen reports of the 2TB having a far greater failure rate than the 3TB or 4TB.

Significantly faster sequential performance than the wd blue. Very satisfied with the build quality and performance.This drive is basically an older RE series drive from wd made for consumers, has extra features the blue lacks which i suggest u check on wd's website before purchase. Packaging is horrible from cloud tail. try to buy from some other seller if possible.

This hard drive will be used to replace my source drive on an older Windows 7 computer when the older drive fails. One of the best drives you can buy, I have used WD Black drives for over 8 years now and they still haven't failed. Very dependable.

Probabilmente il secondo disco rotazionale più veloce di sempre dopo il Velociraptor (che però vanta una velocità di 10000rpm, con conseguente maggior usura e minor affidabilità), questo disco WD Black da un tera, connesso a un controller SATA II o III riesce a gestire transfer rate massicci senza mai calare in prestazioni. Scelto per la possibilità di farlo lavorare anche 24 ore no-stop (ma non illudetevi, per server e NAS servono i WD della serie RED) questo WD Black è un must-have in campo editing, video e/o musicale. Testato con AJA e Blackmagic, il WD Black 1TB riesce a sfiorare addirittura i 195 mb/sec su singolo trasferimento da 1 gb in lettura e scrittura. Meno prestane sul random write/read rispetto a uno stato solido, riesce comunque a stracciare anche un SSD per quanto riguarda la consistenza della prestazione nel tempo. Con Blackmagic, un Samsung SSD da 250gb dopo cinque passaggi vede calare la sua performance da 400 mb/sec reali a 180-200 mb/sec reali, senza MAI recuperare il gap. Questo WD Black parte a 180 e resta a 180 per ore! Mostruosamente affidabile, non troppo rumoroso (si sente, ma non da fastidio), è la scelta obbligata per i professionisti che vogliono storage consistente e prestazioni eccellenti a costi contenuti e stabilità/affidabilità quasi da server. Metterne due in raid zero significa poter disporre (anche solo su controller SATA II) di quasi 400 MB/sec di velocità reale ininterrottamente per ore. Una manna per lunghe sessioni di video editing o sound design estremo. Amazon lo spedisce in un imballo che comprende due supporti laterali in plastica che isolano il disco da potenziali urti esterni. Altamente consigliato.

[Actualización] compre otro de estos discos esta vez de Amazon México (a inicion de diciembre) y debo decir que aunque es el mismo modelo y mi opinión sobre el producto en si no cambia si estoy decepcionado de Amazon México por la mala calidad con la que empacan productos tan delicados como un HDD pues venia únicamente con hule de burbujas dentro de una caja mucho mas grande que el HDD y muchas de las burbujas estaban rotas por lo que deduzco que no se le da un buen cuidado durante el viaje Aun asi funciono bien y durante este mes no ha fallado porque espero no ocupar garantía Compré este HDD en Amazon USA en Enero. 7 meses despues sigue funcionando solido como una roca y rapido como ningun otro disco mecanico que haya tenido ... y vaya que he usado decenas de ellos!! mi disco principal es un SSD samsung, y este WD Black es usado solo para la LIBRERIA DE STEAM y carga los juegos mas rapido que mi viejo Samsung Spinpoint F3 Pros: -VELOCIDAD!!! -Calidad de construccion -empaquetado a pesar de ser OEM venia en una caja rigida muy bien protegido -supuestamente tiene garantia de 5 años no estoy seguro si aplica en mexico pero habla bien de la empresa y la calidad de sus productos contras: -si eres tacaño el precio seria un impedimento pues por esta cantidad (o hasta menos) consigues uno de 2TB en la plaza de la computacion eso si, reconstruido, recordar que se esta comprando calidad no cantidad -Capacidad... quien diria que 1TB se llenaria tan rapido jeje mi proxima compra quiza sea el de 3TB

The product is reliable. I prefer 1TB HDD to larger capacity HDD so as not too risk a large amount of files in one large HDD. I use multiple 1TB HDD with backup.